Featured and Latest Posts
How Long Would an Active Fund Manager Need to Demonstrate Outperformance to Be Confident in Their Results?
Most discretionary active fund managers underperform a style-matched benchmark over meaningful periods of ten years or more. A small minority appear to outperform, but how can investors tell whether this reflects skill or luck? The Information ratio (IR) helps quantify this. Even a strong IR of 0.5 implies that investors would need around sixteen years of data before being 95 per cent confident that the fund manager’s results were due to skill. Most managers have far lower IRs, meaning the odds of proving genuine ability are vanishingly small. The mathematics simply does not support the claim of persistent skill.
Understanding Fund Manager Benchmarks: ARC, IA Sectors, and Beyond
When looking at the performance of discretionary fund managers (DFMs) or multi-asset funds, a natural question arises: ‘Compared to what?’ Benchmarks exist to provide that context, but not all benchmarks are created equal. Some measure how markets have performed, others reflect what peers are actually delivering, and each has strengths and weaknesses.
Understanding the Different Equity Indices
When we talk about investing in ‘the market’, we’re usually talking about an index. An index is a basket of securities designed to represent a particular slice of the market. Some are global, some are regional, and others zoom in on a country, sector, or company size.
You can’t invest in an index directly, but you can invest in mutual funds and ETFs that track them. Knowing which index you’re tracking matters because different providers slice the market in different ways.
The Long Shadow of 1989: Japan’s Markets Against the Developed World
For many investors, Japan can feel like a puzzle. The Nikkei 225 once symbolised unstoppable growth, rising sixfold in the 1980s before peaking in 1989. What followed was decades of stagnation: the market regained its high only thirty five years later, as U.S. and European shares pushed ahead. This long stretch of disappointment has made Japan seem risky or unusual, but in reality the lesson is simple. Valuations matter. Indeed, buying into markets when prices are extreme can lock in years of weak returns. At the same time, Japan shows the importance of diversification. No single country, however dynamic, is immune to setbacks. For retail investors, the takeaway is not that Japan should be avoided, but that it is one part of a wider global portfolio, balancing risk and opportunity across regions.
Good financial decisions aren’t about predicting the future, they’re about following a sound process today.
In investing, outcomes are noisy. Short-term performance often reflects randomness, not skill. Yet fund managers continue to pitch five-year track records as if they prove anything. They don’t.
As Ken French puts it, a five-year chart ‘tells you nothing’. The real skill lies in filtering out the noise, evaluating strategy, incentives, costs, and behavioural fit.
Don’t chase what worked recently. Stick with what works reliably.